Is Stigma A Stigmatizing Word? A Political Question for Science

Pat Corrigan, Dror Ben-Zeev

Abstract


Asserting “stigma is a stigmatizing term” is a political statement, a position to which some social scientists may object. They may counter that allowing politics to bleed into an important scholarly question like this will undermine the quality of emerging answers. In this paper, we summarize what many sociologists and philosophers of scientific knowledge maintain; science and its methods are inextricably intertwined with political agenda. We demonstrate this by showing classic examples from astronomy as well as more relevant ones from medicine and psychiatry. Community based participatory research (CBPR) is an excellent vehicle for blending political opinion with scientific method so CBPR principles and practices are briefly reviewed, especially in terms of an anti-stigma research agenda. Ironically, we believe recognizing the limits of science for the stigma-is-a-stigmatizing-word question is by no means freeing for advocates. The community of stakeholders invested in this issue still need to deal with the political realities of their diversity and the challenge of developing consensus about stigma as a term and, more importantly, how to erase it.

 


References


American Psychiatric Association. (1952). Diagnostic and statistical manual: mental disorders. Washington, DC.

American Psychiatric Association. (1968). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (2nd ed.). Washington, DC.

American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC.

American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (Revised 3rd ed.). Washington, DC.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC.

Bleuler, E. (1911). Dementia praecox or the group of schizophrenas. (J. Zinkin, Trans.) New York: International Universities Press.

Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Bogart, L. M., & Uyeda, K. (2009). Community-based participatory research: partnering with communities for effective and sustainable behavioral health interventions. Health Psychology, 28, 391–393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016387.

Chamberlin, J. (1977). On our own. Lawrence, MA: the National Empowerment Cetner, Inc.

Chene, R., Garcia, L., Goldstrom, M., Pino, M., Roach, D. P., Thunderchief, W., et al. (2005). Mental health research in primary care: mandates from a community advisory board. The Annals of Family Medicine, 3, 70–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.260.

Christopher, S., Watts, V., McCormick, A. K. H. G., & Young, S. (2008). Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1398–1406. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.125757.

Corrigan, P. W., Salzer, M., Ralph, R. O., Sangster, Y., & Keck, L. (2004). Examining the factor structure of the Recovery Assessment Scale. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30, 1035–1041.

Corrigan, P. W., Slopen, N., Gracia, G., Phelan, S., Keogh, C. B., & Keck, L. (2005). Some recovery processes in mutual-help groups for persons with mental illness; II: qualitative analysis of participant interviews. Community Mental Health Journal, 41, 721–735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10597-005-6429-0.

Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2007). The stigma of psychiatric disorders and the gender, ethnicity, and education of the perceiver. Community mental health journal, 43, 439–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e31815c046e.

Covell, N. H., McCorkle, B. H., Weissman, E. M., Summerfelt, T., & Essock, S. M. (2007). What’s in a name? Terms preferred by service recipients. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 34, 443–447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10488-007-0123-1.

Deegan, P. E. (1988). Recovery: the lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 11, 11–19.

Drake, R. E., & Bond, G. R. (2007). Case studies of evidence-based practice implementation. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 10, 81–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15487760701345901.

Drake, R. E., Bond, G. R., & Essock, S. M. (2009). Implementing evidence-based practices for people with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 35, 704–713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbp041.

Durkheim, E. (1912). The elementary forms of religious life. Paris: Alcan.

Farina, A. (1998). Stigma. In K. T. Mueser & N. Tarrier (Eds.), Handbook of social functioning in schizophrenia (pp. 247–279). Boston, MA: Allyn &

Bacon.

Feyerabend, P. (1981a). Problems of empiricism (Philosophical Papers Vol. 2). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Feyerabend, P. (1981b). Realism, rationalism and scientific method (Philosophical Papers Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Foucault, M. (1972). The archology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon Press.

Gambrill, E. (2006). Evidence-based practice and policy: choices ahead. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 338–357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049731505284205.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.

Hacking, I. (1981). Lakatos’s philosophy of science. In I. Hacking (Ed.), Scientific Revolutions (pp. 128–143). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Oxford, England: Prentice-Hall.

Hopper, K., Harrison, G., Janca, A., & Sartorius, N. (Eds.). (2007). Recovery from schizophrenia: an international perspective: a report from the WHO Collaborative Project, the international study of schizophrenia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kraepelin, E. (1921). Dementia praecox and paraphrenia (R. M. Barclay, Trans.). Edinburgh, UK: E. & S. Livingstone.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Minkler, M. E., & Wallerstein, N. E. (Eds.). (2003). Community based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Möller, H. J., Jäger, M., Riedel, M., Obermeier, M., Strauss, A., & Bottlender, R. (2010). The Munich 15-year follow-up study (MUFUSSAD) on first-hospitalized patients with schizophrenic or affective disorders: comparison of psychopathological and psychosocial course and outcome and prediction of chronicity. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 260, 367–384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00406-010-0117-y.

Mueser, K. T., Glynn, S. M., Corrigan, P. W., & Baber, W. (1996). A survey of preferred terms for users of mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 47, 760–761.

Müller-Lauter, W. (2000). Heidegger und Nietzsche (Vol. 3). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F. (1882). The gay science. London: Vintage Books.

Parekh, B. C. (2002). Rethinking multiculturalism: cultural diversity and political theory. London: Harvard University Press.

Penn, D. L., & Nowlin-Drummond, A. (2001). Politically Correct Labels and Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 27, 197–203.

Popper, K. R. (1934). The logic of scientific discovery. Vienna: Springer.

Ralph, R. O., & Corrigan, P. W. (Eds.). (2005). Recovery in mental illness: broadening our understanding of wellness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Rao, D., Feinglass, J., & Corrigan, P. (2007). Racial and ethnic disparities in mental illness stigma. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195, 1020–1023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e31815c046e.

Rogers, E. S., & Palmer-Erbs, V. (1994). Participatory Action Research: implications for research and evaluation in psychiatric rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 18, 3–12.

Rothman, D. J., McDonald, W. J., Berkowitz, C. D., Chimonas, S. C., DeAngelis, C. D., Hale, R. W., et al. (2009). Professional medical associations and their relationships with industry. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association, 301, 1367–1372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.407.

Silverman, G. K., Loewenstein, G. F., Anderson, B. L., Ubel, P. A., Zinberg, S., & Schulkin, J. (2010). Failure to discount for conflict of interest when evaluating medical literature: a randomised trial of physicians. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36, 265–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.034496.


Full Text: PDF


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 License.